Campbell v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Federal Circuit

Campbell v. Merit Systems Protection Board

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJune 2, 2011

Docket2011-3096

StatusUnpublished

This text of Campbell v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Campbell v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Campbell v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Circuit ELMER E. CAMPBELL, JR., Petition.er, ‘ V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, - Respondent. 2011-3096 _ Petition for review of the Merit Systen1s Protection Board in case no. SF0752100331-I-1. ON MOTION ORDER The United States Posta1 Services moves without op- position to reform the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection B0ard as the respondent. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is desig- nated as the respondent when the Board's decision con- cerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. We

CAMPBELL V. MSPB 2 dete rn1ine that the Board should be designated as the respondent. Accordingly, I'r ls 0R:oERED THA'1‘: The motion is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. FoR THE C0r_JRT 0 2 /s/ J an Horbaly ccc s20 Date J an H0rbaly ` Clerk Elrner E. Ca1npbell, Jr. -- Jessica R. T0plin, Esq. l-_-1 Eo ` ` , l.S.COURTO PEAi,S FOR Kather1ne Sm1th, Esq 1HEFEDEl;FAi`\_PClRcUH JUN 02 2011 .|ANHDRBALY CLEIll

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Circuit ELMER E. CAMPBELL, JR., Petition.er, ‘ V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, - Respondent. 2011-3096 _ Petition for review of the Merit Systen1s Protection Board in case no. SF0752100331-I-1. ON MOTION ORDER The United States Posta1 Services moves without op- position to reform the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection B0ard as the respondent. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is desig- nated as the respondent when the Board's decision con- cerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. We

CAMPBELL V. MSPB 2 dete rn1ine that the Board should be designated as the respondent. Accordingly, I'r ls 0R:oERED THA'1‘: The motion is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. FoR THE C0r_JRT 0 2 /s/ J an Horbaly ccc s20 Date J an H0rbaly ` Clerk Elrner E. Ca1npbell, Jr. -- Jessica R. T0plin, Esq. l-_-1 Eo ` ` , l.S.COURTO PEAi,S FOR Kather1ne Sm1th, Esq 1HEFEDEl;FAi`\_PClRcUH JUN 02 2011 .|ANHDRBALY CLEIll

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Campbell v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack