Campbell v. M'Clenachan

6 Serg. & Rawle 171
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 19, 1820
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 Serg. & Rawle 171 (Campbell v. M'Clenachan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. M'Clenachan, 6 Serg. & Rawle 171 (Pa. 1820).

Opinion

Tilghman C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court, (after stating the facts.)

This point has been frequently decided by this Court. Parol evidence may be given of what passed between the parties, at, and immediately before the execution of a writing, in a case like the present, where the plaintiff was induced to execute the articles of agreement by the defendant’s promise to let him have the timber. To refuse performance of the verbal promise, after having made use of it to get the plaintiff’s signature to the agreement, is a trick, of which the law will not permit the defendant to avail himself. It is therefore the opinion of the Court, that the evidence ought to have been received. The judgment is to be reversed, and a venire facias de novo awarded.

Judgment reversed, and a venire facias de novo awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Mertz
2 Watts 406 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1834)
Mackey v. Brownfield
13 Serg. & Rawle 239 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1825)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Serg. & Rawle 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-mclenachan-pa-1820.