Campbell v. Maze

307 So. 2d 234, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14600
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 1975·No. No. 74-963·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OWEN, Chief Justice.

Petitioners (defendants in a personal injury action in which plaintiff took a voluntary dismissal) seek review of an order taxing costs pursuant to Rule 1.420(d), R.C.P., wherein the court declined to assess attorney’s fees as part of the costs.

In support of their position, the petitioners rely upon the case of Royal-Globe Insurance Companies v. Indian River Gas Co., Fla.App.1973, 281 So.2d 380.1 That was a split decision, and with due deference, we decline to follow that case. Instead, we adopt the view expressed by Judge Wigginton in his dissent, wherein he stated as follows:

“It has long been the law of Florida that except where attorney’s fees may be al[235] lowed in equity from a specific fund or property which may be lawfully charged with their payment, attorney’s fees may not be recovered except when specifically authorized by statute or by agreement of the parties.” (Footnote Omitted.)

We conclude that the petition for writ of certiorari is without merit and therefore it should be and is hereby denied.

Certiorari denied.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ, concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. Maze, 307 So. 2d 234, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14600 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

307 So. 2d 234 (Campbell v. Maze) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sholkoff v. BOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSP.
693 So. 2d 1114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
In Re Estate of Lewis
442 So. 2d 290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Campbell v. Maze
339 So. 2d 202 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
STATE, DEPARTMENT OF CITRUS v. Griffin
332 So. 2d 54 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)