Campbell v. Manning

697 So. 2d 1020, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9276, 1997 WL 473805
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 13, 1997
DocketNo. 97-2067
StatusPublished

This text of 697 So. 2d 1020 (Campbell v. Manning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. Manning, 697 So. 2d 1020, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9276, 1997 WL 473805 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the filing of the emergency petition for writ of Habeas Corpus, we ordered the petitioner released forthwith on his own recognizance. The jailer has now filed a response in which he admits that Campbell’s conviction and imprisonment for indirect criminal contempt based on his failure to pay child support, which followed a trial at which he purportedly waived counsel below, are constitutionally invalid because the trial court failed completely to comply with either Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) or Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d). Judgment in [1021]*1021habeas corpus is therefore awarded the petitioner.

T , , Habeas Corpus granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Faretta v. California
422 U.S. 806 (Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
697 So. 2d 1020, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9276, 1997 WL 473805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-manning-fladistctapp-1997.