Campbell v. Ludin

104 N.Y.S. 372
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 16, 1907·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The value of the horse injured was a question of fact for the jury, and they should have been left free to determine it. The learned justice erred in instructing the jury that, if they found a verdict for the plaintiff, it must be for $150. Reves v. Hyde, 14 Daly, 432.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. Ludin, 104 N.Y.S. 372 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

104 N.Y.S. 372 (Campbell v. Ludin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Acme Pattern & Machine Co. v. Ruchte
223 A.D. 493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)