CAMPBELL v. KUHN

CourtDistrict Court, D. New Jersey
DecidedJuly 29, 2025
Docket3:25-cv-02992
StatusUnknown

This text of CAMPBELL v. KUHN (CAMPBELL v. KUHN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
CAMPBELL v. KUHN, (D.N.J. 2025).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

ELIAS CAMPBELL, Petitioner, Vv. Civil Action No. 25-2992 (GC) VICTORIA L. KUHN, MEMORANDUM & ORDER Department of Corrections, Respondent.

CASTNER, District Judge Petitioner, who is currently incarcerated at the Essex County Correctional Facility, Newark, New Jersey, is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 § 2241 (Section 2241"). (ECF No. 1 (“Petition”).) Local Civil Rule 81,2 provides: Unless prepared by counsel, petitions to this Court for a writ of habeas corpus ... shall be in writing (legibly handwritten in ink or typewritten), signed by the petitioner or movant, on forms supplied by the Clerk, L. Civ. R. 81.2(a). Petitioner did not use the habeas form supplied by the Clerk for Section 2241 petitions, ie., AO 242 (12/11) Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Furthermore, Petitioner did not submit the five-dollar filing fee for a habeas petition, see 28 U.S.C. § 1914{a), or apply to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”).

IT IS, therefore, on this day aay, 2025, ORDERED as follows: ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively terminate this case, without filing the Petition; Petitioner is informed that administrative termination is not a “dismissal” for

purposes of the statute of limitations, and that if the case is reopened, it is not subject to the statute of limitations time bar if it was originally filed timely, see Papotto v, Hartford Life & Ace. Ins. Co., 731 F.3d 265, 275 (3d Cir. 2013) (distinguishing administrative terminations from dismissals); Jenkins v. Superintendent of Laurel Highlands, 705 F.3d 80, 84 n.2 (3d Cir, 2013) (describing prisoner mailbox rule generally); Dasilva v. Sheriff's Dep’t., 413 F. App’x 498, 502 (3rd Cir, 2011) (per curiam) (“[The] statute of limitations is met when a {motion] is submitted to the clerk before the statute runs... .”); and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall forward to Petitioner a blank Section 2241 form—AO 242 (12/11) Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241——by regular U.S. mail; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court’s service of the blank Section 2241 form shall not be construed as this Court’s finding that the Petition is or is not timely, that the Petitioner’s claims

are or are not unexhausted, or that his claims are or are not procedurally defaulted; and it is further ORDERED that if Petitioner wishes to reopen this case, he shail so notify the Court, in a writing addressed to the Clerk of the Court, Clarkson 8. Fisher Building & U.S. Courthouse, 402 East State Street, Trenton, NJ 08608, within 30 days of the date of entry of this Memorandum and Order; Petitioner’s writing shall include a complete, signed habeas petition on the appropriate form and either (i) a complete [FP application or (ii) the five-dollar filing fee; and it is further ORDERED that upon receipt of a writing from Petitioner stating that he wishes to reopen this case, the complete, signed habeas petition on the appropriate form, and either a complete IFP

application or payment of the filing fee within the time allotted by this Court, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to reopen this case; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shali serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order and a blank form DNJ-Pro Se-007-B-(Rev, 09/09) upon Petitioner_by regular ie : E CASTNER ited States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DaSilva v. Sheriff's Department
413 F. App'x 498 (Third Circuit, 2011)
Robert Jenkins v. Superintendent Laurel Highland
705 F.3d 80 (Third Circuit, 2013)
Lisa Papotto v. Hartford Life & Accident Insur
731 F.3d 265 (Third Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
CAMPBELL v. KUHN, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-kuhn-njd-2025.