Campbell v. Keene

7 R.I. Dec. 39
CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island
DecidedOctober 14, 1930
DocketNo. 82632
StatusPublished

This text of 7 R.I. Dec. 39 (Campbell v. Keene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. Keene, 7 R.I. Dec. 39 (R.I. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

BLODGETT, P. J.

Heard jury trial waived.

Action to recover the sum of $1000 from defendant under an oral contract. Plaintiff is a son of William Campbell, formerly a member of the Pawtucket police. William 'Campbell married a second wife. There were no children of the second marriage, the plaintiff being born of a former wife. Annie, the second wife, owned certain real estate in Pawtucket and died seized of the same and intestate.

Upon the death of Annie Campbell the defendant, Arthur E. Keene, inherited said real estate as the next of kin.

It is claimed by plaintiff that during his life time his father, William Campbell, threatened to commence an equitable action to determine an equitable title to said real estate in himself, and that, in consideration of his forbearance to commence said action, defendant agreed to convey to him, said William 'Campbell, a life interest in said real estate, and, further, upon the death of said William to pay to his son, the present plaintiff, one thousand dollars ; that, in pursuance of said agreement, said defendant conveyed said real estate to one Corbett and Corbett conveyed a life estate in same, to said William Campbell, but that defendant has refused to carry out the second part of said alleged agreement.

The deed from Corbett contained no reference to any such agreement, and no memorandum of any kind was made as to the payment of $1000 to William F. upon the death of his father. The deeds recite the existence of a mortgage upon said real estate at the time of the death of Annie, the second wife, for $1200.

For plaintiff: Edward DeV. O’Con-nor. For defendant: Harold A. Andrews.

There was offered in evidence and admitted a memorandum made by Asaph B. Wicks, a clergyman of Paw-tucket, of notes for a proposed will of Annie 'Campbell. This memorandum was made January 23, 1919, at a time when said Annie was on her death bed. An attorney had drawn up a will in accordance with said memorandum, but Annie died before same could be executed.

This memorandum provides for a life estate to her husband, William, on condition that he, William, “clear the real estate of all debts,” and further provides that upon the death of said William the real estate should be sold and the sum of $1000 be paid to the present plaintiff.

William Campbell held saic\ real estate until his death, occupying a part of the same and collecting all revenue from same, but did not pay the mortgage debt upon the same.

After the death of Annie defendant claims he had an interview with said William and, in view of the fact that Annie was intending to make a will in effect following said memorandum, did agree to convey a life estate to William with the. understanding that he, William, would from the income of said estate pay said mortgage debt.

Defendant denies that he ever agreed to pay William F. Campbell $1000' on the death of. his father.

In view of the fact that no memorandum containing such an agreement was ever made, as easily same might have been done, and, further, that the alleged consideration for the making of such an, agreement was of such a shadowy nature, no such action having been commenced, and, further, that the burden rests upon plaintiff to satisfy the Court by the Weight of the evidence that defendant did make such an unusual agreement, the Court is no!: satisfied that plaintiff has sustained this burden.

Decision for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 R.I. Dec. 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-keene-risuperct-1930.