Campbell v. Jordan

904 F.2d 699, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8527, 1990 WL 76526
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 25, 1990
Docket90-6037
StatusUnpublished

This text of 904 F.2d 699 (Campbell v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. Jordan, 904 F.2d 699, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8527, 1990 WL 76526 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

904 F.2d 699
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Russell James CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Fred JORDAN, Commissioner; Eugene Nuth, Warden MCI-J;
William Goble, Classification Supervisor MCI-J;
Sgt. Price, Correctional Officer MCI-J,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6037.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 7, 1990.
Decided: May 25, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Chief District Judge. (C/A No. 89-1353-H).

Russell James Campbell, appellant pro se.

Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md.

REMANDED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Russell J. Campbell appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. His notice of appeal was filed outside the appeal period prescribed by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1). However, we construe his notice of appeal to contain a motion for an extension of time pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5). Because the district court has not yet acted on Campbell's motion, we remand the appeal to the district court for action on the motion. The record, as supplemented, should then be returned to this Court for further consideration.

REMANDED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coffey (William H.) v. Pslj, Inc
904 F.2d 699 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
904 F.2d 699, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8527, 1990 WL 76526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-jordan-ca4-1990.