Campbell v. Johnson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 28, 2007
Docket07-6266
StatusUnpublished

This text of Campbell v. Johnson (Campbell v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. Johnson, (4th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6266

MICHAEL JOSEPH CAMPBELL, and all prisoners similarly situated,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; Mrs. HELEN F. FEHEY, Chairwoman, Virginia Parole Board; LIEUTENANT HARRISON, Building Supervisor, Sussex I State Prison; LIEUTENANT BRONSON, Building Supervisor, Sussex I State Prison; CHIEF COUNSELOR WILLIAMS, Sussex I State Prison; DOCTOR EMRAN, Medical Doctor, Sussex I State Prison,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00393-TSE-BR)

Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Joseph Campbell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Joseph Campbell appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court

as modified to reflect dismissal without prejudice of Campbell’s

parole denial claim. Campbell v. Johnson, No. 1:06-cv-00393-TSE-BR

(Dec. 11, 2006 & Jan. 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Campbell v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-johnson-ca4-2007.