Campbell v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad
This text of 282 A.D. 864 (Campbell v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The injunctive and directive provisions of the judgment are warranted as protective measures. The allowance of a counsel fee to plaintiffs is also warranted as the plaintiffs virtually acted in the position of the trustee. It also appears that in fact the services of plaintiffs’ counsel were for the benefit of the defendant company. Judgment unanimously affirmed. Present — Peek, P. J., Cohn, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ.; Cohn, J., taking no part. [See post, p. 935.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 A.D. 864, 124 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-hudson-manhattan-railroad-nyappdiv-1953.