Campbell v. Hicks

19 Ohio St. (N.S.) 433
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1869·Published

Opinion

Welch, J.

We do not see on what principle the plaintiff can ask to be relieved at the hands of a court of equity. He has utterly failed himself to fulfil the agreements which he seeks to enforce against the defendant; and his failure appears to be without any just excuse. Parties askiüg the specific execution of contracts must make it appear that they have been prompt, willing, and anxious ” to perform on their part. Otherwise, as a general rule, they will be left to their remedies at law.

The petition is dismissed with costs.

Bbinkerhoff, C.J., and Scott, White, and Day, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. Hicks, 19 Ohio St. (N.S.) 433 (Ohio 1869).

19 Ohio St. (N.S.) 433 (Campbell v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.