Campbell v. Grove

New York Supreme Court

Campbell v. Grove

2 Johns. Cas. 105

DecidedOctober 15, 1800

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Johns. Cas. 105 (Campbell v. Grove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Campbell v. Grove, 2 Johns. Cas. 105 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant must take nothing by his motion. The attorney had no other way of compelling the payment of his costs, than by the suit on the bail-bond. Besides, the defendant has suffered such a length of time to elapse, that we would not now relieve, if there had been originally just grounds for such interference.

Rule refused.(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant must take nothing by his motion. The attorney had no other way of compelling the payment of his costs, than by the suit on the bail-bond. Besides, the defendant has suffered such a length of time to elapse, that we would not now relieve, if there had been originally just grounds for such interference.

Rule refused.(

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Johns. Cas. 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-grove-nysupct-1800.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack