Campbell v. Grove

New York Supreme Court

Campbell v. Grove

2 Johns. Cas. 105

New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1800·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant must take nothing by his motion. The attorney had no other way of compelling the payment of his costs, than by the suit on the bail-bond. Besides, the defendant has suffered such a length of time to elapse, that we would not now relieve, if there had been originally just grounds for such interference.

Rule refused.(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant must take nothing by his motion. The attorney had no other way of compelling the payment of his costs, than by the suit on the bail-bond. Besides, the defendant has suffered such a length of time to elapse, that we would not now relieve, if there had been originally just grounds for such interference.

Rule refused.(

Campbell v. Grove, 2 Johns. Cas. 105 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

Pincite

2 Johns. Cas. 105 (Campbell v. Grove) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related