Campbell v. Gittere

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided September 18, 2019·No. 3:19-cv-00576·Unknown

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 JERMAINE JAMAICA CAMPBELL, SR., Case No. 3:19-cv-00576-MMD-WGC 5 Petitioner, ORDER 6 v.

7 WARDEN RUSSELL, et al., 8 Respondents. 9 10 11 This action is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, 12 by Jermaine Jamaica Campbell, Sr., an individual incarcerated at Nevada’s Warm 13 Spring’s Correctional Center. On September 17, 2019, Petitioner filed an application to 14 proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1), along with his habeas petition (ECF No. 1-1 and 15 1-2), and a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1-3). 16 The application to proceed in forma pauperis is incomplete in that it does not 17 include a completed financial certificate. See LR LSR 1-2. The Court will deny the 18 application to proceed in forma pauperis on that ground but will not require Petitioner to 19 pay the filing fee, or file a new in forma pauperis application, until after counsel appears 20 for him. 21 State prisoners applying for habeas corpus relief are not entitled to appointed 22 counsel unless the circumstances indicate that appointed counsel is necessary to prevent 23 due process violations. Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986) (citing 24 Kreiling v. Field, 431 F.2d 638, 640 (9th Cir. 1970) (per curiam)). The court may, however, 25 appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings if the interests of justice so require. See 26 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; Rule 8(c), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196. 27 Petitioner indicates that he is serving two consecutive sentences of life in prison with the 28 possibility of parole after ten years. Further, it appears that Petitioner raises several 1 issues, some of which may be relatively complex, and that Petitioner will not be able to 2 adequately litigate this action without counsel. The Court therefore finds that appointment 3 of counsel is in the interests of justice. The Court will grant Petitioner’s motion for 4 appointment of counsel and will appoint the Federal Public Defender for the District of 5 Nevada to represent him. 6 The Court has examined the petition in this case pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules 7 Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts and determines that 8 it merits service upon Respondents. The Court will order the petition served upon 9 Respondents, and will direct Respondents to appear, but will not require any further action 10 on the part of Respondents at this time. 11 It is therefore ordered that Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis 12 (ECF No. 1) is denied. 13 It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court is directed to separately file the 14 petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF Nos. 1-1 and 1-2) and the motion for appointment 15 of counsel (ECF No. 1-3). 16 It is further ordered that Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 17 1-3) is granted. The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (FPD) is appointed 18 to represent Petitioner. If the FPD is unable to represent Petitioner, because of a conflict 19 of interest or for any other reason, alternate counsel will be appointed. In either case, 20 counsel will represent Petitioner in all federal court proceedings relating to this matter, 21 unless allowed to withdraw. 22 It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court is directed to electronically serve 23 upon the FPD a copy of this order, together with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas 24 corpus (ECF Nos. 1-1 and 1-2). 25 It is further ordered that the FPD will have 30 days from the date of this order to 26 file a notice of appearance, or to indicate to the Court its inability to represent Petitioner 27 in this case. 28 /// 1 It is further ordered that the requirement that Petitioner pay the filing fee for this 2 || action or file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis is suspended. The Court will 3 || set a deadline for payment of the filing fee or filing of a new application to proceed in 4 || forma pauperis after counsel appears for Petitioner and Respondents. 5 It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court is directed to add Aaron Ford, 6 || Attorney General of the State of Nevada, as counsel for Respondents. 7 It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court is directed to electronically serve 8 || upon Respondents a copy of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF Nos. 1-1 and 9 || 1-2), and a copy of this order. 10 It is further ordered that Respondents will have 30 days from the date of this order 11 || to appear in this action. Respondents will not be required to respond to the habeas petition 12 || at this time. 13 DATED THIS 18" day of September 2019. 14 -——~ {Go IRANDA M. DU 16 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. Gittere, (D. Nev. 2019).

Campbell v. Gittere (Campbell v. Gittere) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related