Campbell v. Florida Parole Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Campbell v. Florida Parole Commission

657 So. 2d 67, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7352, 1995 WL 405283

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 11, 1995

DocketNo. 92-3797

StatusPublished

This text of 657 So. 2d 67 (Campbell v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Campbell v. Florida Parole Commission, 657 So. 2d 67, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7352, 1995 WL 405283 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We previously affirmed in part and reversed in part an order of the trial court denying the appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus. See Campbell v. Florida Parole Commission, 630 So.2d 1210 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Thereafter, upon petition for certiora-ri, the United States Supreme Court, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 1819, 131 L.Ed.2d 742 (1995), vacated our judgment and remanded the case to this court for further proceedings not inconsistent with California Department of Corrections v. Morales, — U.S.—, 115 S.Ct. 1597, 131 L.Ed.2d 588 (1995). Having reconsidered our earlier opinion, and finding nothing therein inconsistent with Morales, we hereby reinstate our earlier opinion and decision.

ERVIN and ALLEN, JJ., and SMITH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We previously affirmed in part and reversed in part an order of the trial court denying the appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus. See Campbell v. Florida Parole Commission, 630 So.2d 1210 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Thereafter, upon petition for certiora-ri, the United States Supreme Court, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 1819, 131 L.Ed.2d 742 (1995), vacated our judgment and remanded the case to this court for further proceedings not inconsistent with California Department of Corrections v. Morales, — U.S.—, 115 S.Ct. 1597, 131 L.Ed.2d 588 (1995). Having reconsidered our earlier opinion, and finding nothing therein inconsistent with Morales, we hereby reinstate our earlier opinion and decision.

ERVIN and ALLEN, JJ., and SMITH, Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

657 So. 2d 67, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7352, 1995 WL 405283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack