Campbell v. First National Bank

105 S.E. 413, 115 S.C. 256, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 224
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 20, 1920
Docket10529
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 105 S.E. 413 (Campbell v. First National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. First National Bank, 105 S.E. 413, 115 S.C. 256, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 224 (S.C. 1920).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This is an appeal from an order of Judge Memminger, confirming a report of the master for Charleston county, and involves the question whether or not the bailment of a chose in action is within the terms of section 3740 of volume I of the Code of 1912.

Both the master and his Honor held that it did. The exceptions must be sustained. The statute does not apply to choses in actions, such as notes, bonds, mortgages, and /such securities as usually are transferred by delivery oi assignment.

The statute never contemplated that such securities should come within the terms of this section. It contemplated such tangible property as steam engines, pianos, organs, -mules, stock of goods, and such property of like character, arid never was intended to apply to negotiable securities, notes, bonds, mortgages, and such property as goes usually by assignment or actual delivery. The action applies to tangible personal property.

The agreement, by which Campbell loaned his bonds to Mordecai, being a bailment of choses in action, was not required to be recorded under the terms of section 3740 of the Civil Code, and the judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed.

Messrs. Justices Hydrick and Fraser concur. Mr. Chiee Justice Gary and Mr. Justice Gage absent on account of sickness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southern General Factors, Inc. v. Parker Concrete Pile Co.
236 F. Supp. 103 (E.D. South Carolina, 1964)
In re Tansill
17 F.2d 413 (W.D. South Carolina, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 S.E. 413, 115 S.C. 256, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-first-national-bank-sc-1920.