Campbell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

179 So. 2d 527, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3983
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided October 27, 1965·No. No. 1506·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

FRUGÉ, Judge.

This is a companion case with 179 So.2d 522, decided this date. The present plaintiff appealed insofar as his claim was rejected against the Employers Fire Insurance Company, liability insurer of Howard, the driver in whose car plaintiffs minor son was riding as passenger. For the reasons set forth in the companion suit, we affirm the judgment of the district court in favor of Edward E. Campbell, Sr., individually and for the estate of his minor son, Edward E. Campbell, Jr., against Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York. However, the judgment is reversed insofar as it rejected the demand against the defendant Employers Fire Insurance Company, which we now hold liable unto the plaintiff in solido with Fidelity & Casualty (subject to Employers’ policy limits).

Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York and Employers Fire Insurance Company are cast in solido for all trial and appellate costs of these proceedings.

Amended and affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, 179 So. 2d 527, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3983 (La. Ct. App. 1965).

179 So. 2d 527 (Campbell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howard v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York
179 So. 2d 522 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1965)