Campbell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Campbell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

179 So. 2d 527, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3983

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 27, 1965

DocketNo. 1506

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 So. 2d 527 (Campbell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Campbell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, 179 So. 2d 527, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3983 (La. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinions

FRUGÉ, Judge.

This is a companion case with 179 So.2d 522, decided this date. The present plaintiff appealed insofar as his claim was rejected against the Employers Fire Insurance Company, liability insurer of Howard, the driver in whose car plaintiffs minor son was riding as passenger. For the reasons set forth in the companion suit, we affirm the judgment of the district court in favor of Edward E. Campbell, Sr., individually and for the estate of his minor son, Edward E. Campbell, Jr., against Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York. However, the judgment is reversed insofar as it rejected the demand against the defendant Employers Fire Insurance Company, which we now hold liable unto the plaintiff in solido with Fidelity & Casualty (subject to Employers’ policy limits).

Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York and Employers Fire Insurance Company are cast in solido for all trial and appellate costs of these proceedings.

Amended and affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FRUGÉ, Judge.

This is a companion case with 179 So.2d 522, decided this date. The present plaintiff appealed insofar as his claim was rejected against the Employers Fire Insurance Company, liability insurer of Howard, the driver in whose car plaintiffs minor son was riding as passenger. For the reasons set forth in the companion suit, we affirm the judgment of the district court in favor of Edward E. Campbell, Sr., individually and for the estate of his minor son, Edward E. Campbell, Jr., against Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York. However, the judgment is reversed insofar as it rejected the demand against the defendant Employers Fire Insurance Company, which we now hold liable unto the plaintiff in solido with Fidelity & Casualty (subject to Employers’ policy limits).

Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York and Employers Fire Insurance Company are cast in solido for all trial and appellate costs of these proceedings.

Amended and affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 So. 2d 527, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-fidelity-casualty-co-of-new-york-lactapp-1965.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack