Campbell v. English

1 Wright 119, 1 Ohio Ch. 119
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1832
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wright 119 (Campbell v. English) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. English, 1 Wright 119, 1 Ohio Ch. 119 (Ohio 1832).

Opinion

LANE, J.

The sale of land upon a petition for partition is one of the duties enjoined by law in certain cases upon the administrator, and is, therefore, e'mbraeed. in the bond for the performance of his: duties; 4 O. 127.

A guardian for a female under twelve years continues only till the ward attains to that age. A guardian, or a man that has been guardian, after his guardianship has expired, has no more power [120]*120than if he had never been appointed. The money, in this case, was-due the child, and the payment to one having no authority is no payment. If proof were admitted, that the child said, after she was of full age, that she had dealt with her former guardian, as guardian, how would it avail? Would her acts, while an infant, change the law? We should think not. .

The judgment is affirmed.

[Guardianship of female under 12 years old expires at that age,, and guardian’s power ceases; approved, Perry v. Brainard, 11 O. 442. 444.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pitzer v. Russel
4 Or. 124 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1871)
Hughes v. Oregon Railway & Nav. Co.
11 Or. 437 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Wright 119, 1 Ohio Ch. 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-english-ohio-1832.