Campbell v. Douglas Knights & Associates, Inc.

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JESSTE CAMPBELL, 7 Case No. 21-cv-01667-HSG Plaintiff, 8 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE Vv. JUDGE’S REPORT AND 9 RECOMMENDATION RE REVIEW DOUGLAS KNIGHTS & ASSOCIATES, UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915 10 INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 11 11 Defendants. a 12 The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Spero’s Report and Recommendation Re

13 || Review Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The time for objections has passed and none were filed. The

v 14 || Court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect.

3 15 || Accordingly, A 16 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. See

2 17 || Lucas v. Dep’t of Corr., 66 F.3d 245, 248 (9th Cir. 1995) (“[A] pro se litigant is entitled to notice 2 18 || of the complaint’s deficiencies and an opportunity to amend prior to dismissal of the action.”). 19 || Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order. 20 || The amended complaint must address the deficiencies identified and discussed at length in the 21 Order to Show Cause issued by Judge Spero. Dkt. No. 10. Failure to adequately address these 22 || issues, or to file an amended complaint by the deadline, may result in the dismissal of the action in 23 || its entirety without further leave to amend. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: 6/28/2021 26 27 Atapurel 5 □ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR? 28 United States District Judge