Campbell v. Department of Workforce Services

2011 UT App 81, 249 P.3d 1013, 678 Utah Adv. Rep. 38, 2011 Utah App. LEXIS 77, 2011 WL 940346
CourtCourt of Appeals of Utah
DecidedMarch 17, 2011
Docket20101021-CA
StatusPublished

This text of 2011 UT App 81 (Campbell v. Department of Workforce Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. Department of Workforce Services, 2011 UT App 81, 249 P.3d 1013, 678 Utah Adv. Rep. 38, 2011 Utah App. LEXIS 77, 2011 WL 940346 (Utah Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

DECISION

PER CURIAM:

T1 Jessica Campbell petitions for judicial review of the final decision of the Workforce Service Appeals Board (the Board). This case is before the court on its own motion for summary disposition based upon lack of jurisdiction due to Campbell's failure to file a timely petition for review of the Board's decision. See Utah R.App. P. 14(a).

T2 A petition for review of an agency's final order must be filed "within 830 days after the date of the written decision or *1014 order." Id.; see also Utah Code Ann. § 63G-4-401(8)(a) (2008) ("A party shall file a petition for judicial review of final agency action within 30 days."). If the petition is not timely filed, this court lacks jurisdiction to review the petition and must dismiss it. See Silva v. Department of Emp't Sec., 786 P.2d 246, 247 (Utah Ct.App.1990) (mem.) (per curiam).

T8 The Board issued its final order on November 16, 2010. Campbell did not file her petition for review until December 22, 2010, thirty-six days after the issuance of the decision by the Board and beyond the time limitation set forth in rule 14(a). See Utah R.App. P. 14(a). Because Campbell did not timely file a petition for review, we lack jurisdiction to consider the merits of the petition. When we lack jurisdiction, we retain "only the authority to dismiss the action." Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. Lamoreaux, 767 P.2d 569, 570 (Utah Ct.App.1989).

T4 Therefore, the petition for review is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. Lamoreaux
767 P.2d 569 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1989)
Silva v. Department of Employment Security
786 P.2d 246 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2011 UT App 81, 249 P.3d 1013, 678 Utah Adv. Rep. 38, 2011 Utah App. LEXIS 77, 2011 WL 940346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-department-of-workforce-services-utahctapp-2011.