Campbell v. Delaware Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Campbell v. Delaware Realty Co.

261 A.D. 1037, 26 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8620

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 20, 1941

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 261 A.D. 1037 (Campbell v. Delaware Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Campbell v. Delaware Realty Co., 261 A.D. 1037, 26 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiff has appealed from an order dismissing her complaint pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that the Statute of Limitations had run against her cause of action. The complaint alleges that defendant was the owner of a three-story brick dwelling house in the city of Albany, and that plaintiff was a tenant in such premises. It is also alleged that ingress and egress from the various apartments to the public highway was by means of a stoop and steps, and that the stoop and steps were not properly maintained by the defendant. Plaintiff alleges that on July 6, 1934, due to the defective condition of the stoop and steps and due to defendant’s failure properly to maintain same, plaintiff fell and sustained injuries, to recover damages for which the action is brought. Although the accident occurred on July 6, 1934, the action was not commenced until June 19, 1940. The Special Term dismissed the complaint on the ground that the Statute of Limitations was a bar. Plaintiff claims that her action is in nuisance rather than negligence and that, consequently, the six-year statute is applicable. The complaint was properly dismissed. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffeman, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff has appealed from an order dismissing her complaint pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that the Statute of Limitations had run against her cause of action. The complaint alleges that defendant was the owner of a three-story brick dwelling house in the city of Albany, and that plaintiff was a tenant in such premises. It is also alleged that ingress and egress from the various apartments to the public highway was by means of a stoop and steps, and that the stoop and steps were not properly maintained by the defendant. Plaintiff alleges that on July 6, 1934, due to the defective condition of the stoop and steps and due to defendant’s failure properly to maintain same, plaintiff fell and sustained injuries, to recover damages for which the action is brought. Although the accident occurred on July 6, 1934, the action was not commenced until June 19, 1940. The Special Term dismissed the complaint on the ground that the Statute of Limitations was a bar. Plaintiff claims that her action is in nuisance rather than negligence and that, consequently, the six-year statute is applicable. The complaint was properly dismissed. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffeman, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 1037, 26 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-delaware-realty-co-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack