Campbell v. Davis

980 F.2d 727, 1992 WL 361681
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 10, 1992
Docket92-6413
StatusUnpublished

This text of 980 F.2d 727 (Campbell v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. Davis, 980 F.2d 727, 1992 WL 361681 (4th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

980 F.2d 727

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Russell James CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Paul J. DAVIS, Chairman, Parole Commission; Bishop L.
Robinson, Secretary of Public Safety; Richard A.
Lanham, Commissioner of Correction,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6413.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 10, 1992
Decided: December 10, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge. (CA-91-2524-H)

Russell James Campbell, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Amy Beth Kushner, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, PHILLIPS, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Russell James Campbell appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Campbell v. Davis, No. CA-91-2524-H (D. Md. Mar. 24, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
980 F.2d 727, 1992 WL 361681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-davis-ca4-1992.