Campbell v. County of San Bernardino

705 F.2d 1128, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28158
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 9, 1983
DocketNo. 81-5037
StatusPublished

This text of 705 F.2d 1128 (Campbell v. County of San Bernardino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. County of San Bernardino, 705 F.2d 1128, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28158 (9th Cir. 1983).

Opinion

ORDER

The judgment of dismissal under Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(6) is vacated. Construing the plaintiff’s complaint liberally, as we must, we cannot say as a matter of law that under no conditions can it be said to state a claim. Colorable claims of Fourth Amendment and due process violations appear to have been asserted.

The premature termination of pro se cases under Rule 12(b)(6) is sometimes counter-productive. It creates extra work for both the trial court and this court. Without the development of an adequate legal and factual record, final review is difficult to achieve. The attention of the district court is called to the possibility of early enlistment of volunteer counsel from law schools or legal service organizations when retained counsel are not available.

Vacated and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
705 F.2d 1128, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-county-of-san-bernardino-ca9-1983.