Campbell v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Campbell v. Commonwealth

6 Ky. Op. 1, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 386

DecidedJune 11, 1872

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Ky. Op. 1 (Campbell v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Campbell v. Commonwealth, 6 Ky. Op. 1, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 386 (Ky. Ct. App. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The act of June 3d, 1865, required the sheriffs of 1865 to collect taxes- due for certain years in counties in which assessments had not been made subsequent to 1860, and to account for and pay the same into the treasury at the same timle the revenue of 1865 wlas due and payable.

By the terms of the act this unusual duty was imposed alone upon sheriffs who might hold office during the year 1865. It is apparent from the statements of the Auditor, and the bond of appellant Campbell filed therewith that he is not proceeded against as a sheriff of 1865.

The bond was not executed until March, 1866, two months after the taxes for 1865 ought to have been accounted for and paid into the treasury. This special duty was imposed upon the sheriffs for 1865 and was required to be discharged within that year, and after that time sheriffs in office were not bound nor had they the legal right to undertake its execution.

Scott, for appellants.

It follows therefore, that appellant Campbell was not liable to be proceeded against in the Franklin Circuit Court by motion for failure to account for the taxes due from Perry county, for the years 1862, ’63, ’64 and ’65. If he was guilty of any dereliction of duty it was in failing to give bond and begin the collection of such taxes within the prescribed time. Appellants did not waive the right- to have a reversal of the four judgments of February, 1870 by reason, of their failure to appear in the court below and object to the character of the proceedings against them'. This court will reverse in all cases in which the petition does not set out a cause of action regardless of whether or not defense was made in the court below.

Hence there -was no petition at all, and as the case does not come within any of the exceptions made in behalf of the Commonwealth, the Franklin Circuit Court had no jurisdiction and ought not to have entertained the motions upon- which the judgments were rendered.

Campbell and his suretiés may, by proper proceedings, be held responsible for all taxes due to the Commonwealth collected by him after the execution of his bond, but as it is a mere common law obligation, it must be proceeded upon as such.

Judgments reversed and cause remanded with instructions to dismiss the motions of appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The act of June 3d, 1865, required the sheriffs of 1865 to collect taxes- due for certain years in counties in which assessments had not been made subsequent to 1860, and to account for and pay the same into the treasury at the same timle the revenue of 1865 wlas due and payable.

By the terms of the act this unusual duty was imposed alone upon sheriffs who might hold office during the year 1865. It is apparent from the statements of the Auditor, and the bond of appellant Campbell filed therewith that he is not proceeded against as a sheriff of 1865.

The bond was not executed until March, 1866, two months after the taxes for 1865 ought to have been accounted for and paid into the treasury. This special duty was imposed upon the sheriffs for 1865 and was required to be discharged within that year, and after that time sheriffs in office were not bound nor had they the legal right to undertake its execution.

Scott, for appellants.

It follows therefore, that appellant Campbell was not liable to be proceeded against in the Franklin Circuit Court by motion for failure to account for the taxes due from Perry county, for the years 1862, ’63, ’64 and ’65. If he was guilty of any dereliction of duty it was in failing to give bond and begin the collection of such taxes within the prescribed time. Appellants did not waive the right- to have a reversal of the four judgments of February, 1870 by reason, of their failure to appear in the court below and object to the character of the proceedings against them'. This court will reverse in all cases in which the petition does not set out a cause of action regardless of whether or not defense was made in the court below.

Hence there -was no petition at all, and as the case does not come within any of the exceptions made in behalf of the Commonwealth, the Franklin Circuit Court had no jurisdiction and ought not to have entertained the motions upon- which the judgments were rendered.

Campbell and his suretiés may, by proper proceedings, be held responsible for all taxes due to the Commonwealth collected by him after the execution of his bond, but as it is a mere common law obligation, it must be proceeded upon as such.

Judgments reversed and cause remanded with instructions to dismiss the motions of appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Ky. Op. 1, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1872.