Campbell v. Common Council of City of Watertown

195 N.W. 442, 46 S.D. 574, 1923 S.D. LEXIS 87
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 18, 1923
DocketFile Nos. 5262, 5293
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 195 N.W. 442 (Campbell v. Common Council of City of Watertown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. Common Council of City of Watertown, 195 N.W. 442, 46 S.D. 574, 1923 S.D. LEXIS 87 (S.D. 1923).

Opinion

GATES, J.

This is an appeal from an order allowing a writ of certiorari to review certain proceedings of the city of Water-town in the matter of paving Third street N. W.

The appeal is dismissed because the order appealed from is not an appealable order. Section 3168, Rev. Code 1919, defines appealable orders. Certiorari is not an action. Rev. Code 1919, § 2091. It is a special proceeding. Rev. Code 1919, §§ 2092, 2991-3005. In order to be appealable, an order made in a special proceeding must affect a substantial right and- also be a final order. Rev. Code 1919, § 3168, subd. 2.

Manifestly an order allowing a writ of certiorari cannot be said to be a final order. It is merely an interlocutory order.

Note. — Reported in 195 N. W. 4'42. See, Headnote, American Key-Numbered Digest, Appeal and error, Key-No. 83, 3 C. J. Seo. 394.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchell National Bank v. Jones
212 N.W. 919 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1927)
Clarke v. Pelter
195 N.W. 442 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 N.W. 442, 46 S.D. 574, 1923 S.D. LEXIS 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-common-council-of-city-of-watertown-sd-1923.