Campbell v. Common Council of City of Watertown

195 N.W. 442, 46 S.D. 574, 1923 S.D. LEXIS 87
South Dakota Supreme Court·Decided October 18, 1923·No. File Nos. 5262, 5293·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

GATES, J.

This is an appeal from an order allowing a writ of certiorari to review certain proceedings of the city of Water-town in the matter of paving Third street N. W.

The appeal is dismissed because the order appealed from is not an appealable order. Section 3168, Rev. Code 1919, defines appealable orders. Certiorari is not an action. Rev. Code 1919, § 2091. It is a special proceeding. Rev. Code 1919, §§ 2092, 2991-3005. In order to be appealable, an order made in a special proceeding must affect a substantial right and- also be a final order. Rev. Code 1919, § 3168, subd. 2.

Manifestly an order allowing a writ of certiorari cannot be said to be a final order. It is merely an interlocutory order.

Note. — Reported in 195 N. W. 4'42. See, Headnote, American Key-Numbered Digest, Appeal and error, Key-No. 83, 3 C. J. Seo. 394.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. Common Council of City of Watertown, 195 N.W. 442, 46 S.D. 574, 1923 S.D. LEXIS 87 (S.D. 1923).

195 N.W. 442 (Campbell v. Common Council of City of Watertown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitchell National Bank v. Jones
212 N.W. 919 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1927)
Clarke v. Pelter
195 N.W. 442 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1923)