Campbell v. Campbell
130 A. 361, 96 N.J. Eq. 398, 11 Stock. 398, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 435
Opinion
The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK — 12.
*Page 399For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Campbell v. Campbell, 130 A. 361, 96 N.J. Eq. 398, 11 Stock. 398, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 435 (N.J. 1924).
130 A. 361 (Campbell v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Huffman v. Huffman
408 S.W.2d 248 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Richardson v. Richardson
236 P.2d 718 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1951)
Immel v. Immel
231 S.W.2d 732 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1950)
Dunavant v. Dunavant
219 S.W.2d 910 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1949)
Rowles v. Reynolds
196 S.W.2d 76 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1946)
Gallagher v. Gallagher
166 P.2d 135 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1946)
Logan v. Logan
176 S.W.2d 601 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1943)
Elsman v. Elsman
2 P.2d 139 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1931)