Campbell v. Campbell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Campbell v. Campbell

884 S.W.2d 435, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1592, 1994 WL 554610

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Campbell v. Campbell. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 182 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 11, 1994·No. No. 65268·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Michael A Campbell, appeals from the St. Charles County Circuit Court’s decision denying appellant’s motion to modify the parties’ decree of dissolution as to custody. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the Commission’s finding pursuant to Rule 84.-[436]*43616(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for the decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Michael A Campbell, appeals from the St. Charles County Circuit Court’s decision denying appellant’s motion to modify the parties’ decree of dissolution as to custody. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the Commission’s finding pursuant to Rule 84.-[436]*43616(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for the decision.

Campbell v. Campbell, 884 S.W.2d 435, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1592, 1994 WL 554610 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

884 S.W.2d 435 (Campbell v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.