Campbell v. Burton
This text of 722 N.E.2d 526 (Campbell v. Burton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Greene App. No. 99CA12. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Decision and Entry dated November 5,1999, at page 9:
“For purposes of the immunity exceptions in R.C. 2744.02(B)(5) and R.C. 2744.03(A)(6)(c), does R.C. 4121.421 expressly impose liability on political subdivisions and their employees for failure to report child abuse?”
Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 99-1838, Campbell v. Burton, Greene App. No. 99CA12.
The conflict cases are Reed v. Perry Cty. Children’s Serv. (June 29, 1993), Perry App. No. CA-429, unreported, 1993 WL 274299; Rich v. Erie Cty. Dept. of Human Serv. (1995), 106 Ohio App.3d 88, 665 N.E.2d 278; Sprouse v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Edn. (Mar. 12, 1999), Lucas App. No. L-98-1098, unreported, 1999 WL 128636; and Crago v. Lorain Cty. Commrs. (1990), 69 Ohio App.3d 24, 590 N.E.2d 15.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
722 N.E.2d 526, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1493, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-burton-ohio-2000.