Campbell v. Barclay

4 F. Cas. 1156, 4 Biss. 517
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois
DecidedApril 15, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 F. Cas. 1156 (Campbell v. Barclay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. Barclay, 4 F. Cas. 1156, 4 Biss. 517 (circtndil 1869).

Opinion

DRUMMOND, District Judge.

This is the rule that I have always adopted in these [1157]*1157cases, that where there is any agreement, understanding, negotiation, or any thing of the sort, as to the disposition of a case, and there is a difference of opinion between the counsel as to what actually took place, that, as it arises from the fact of the negotiations pending between the parties, although there may be a difference of opinion, or misunderstanding, I will not allow the party to be prejudiced by the misunderstanding. Where counsel deal with each other at arm’s-length, each standing on his own rights, of course there need be nothing of that sort; but where a negotiation is entered into between counsel, and difficulty and misunderstandings arise in consequence of that, I do not allow the party to be prejudiced. If you say that there never was anything of the kind at all; that there never was an agreement or understanding that the declaration should be given to them, and plea furnished by them. — that is another matter. If you say this is made out of whole doth, that is another matter.

Judgment set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

C. J. Huebel Co. v. MacKinnon
152 N.W. 1098 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 F. Cas. 1156, 4 Biss. 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-barclay-circtndil-1869.