Campbell Construction Co. v. Saunders
This text of 203 N.W. 170 (Campbell Construction Co. v. Saunders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an injunction bill which asks for an accounting and for the foreclosure of a land contract, with a general prayer for relief. Upon the hearing in the court below the defendants Saunders did not appear. The other parties to the litigation agreed upon what the decree should contain and it was entered accordingly.
The appellants have filed no briefs in this court and if the case had been on the law side of the court *300 it would have been affirmed on call. As it is on the chancery side of the court we have examined the record and find that the decree entered is a proper one.
It is made to appear that since said decree was signed Robert Henkel has had to pay out sums of money in the way of taxes and sums due on the mortgage mentioned in said decree, which sums should be added to the' sums mentioned in the decree. The plaintiff may have thirty days in which to pay the amount due to.Mr. Henkel.
Thus modified the decree is affirmed, with costs against the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
203 N.W. 170, 230 Mich. 299, 1925 Mich. LEXIS 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-construction-co-v-saunders-mich-1925.