Campbell Coal Co. v. Manchester Baptist Church
This text of 169 S.E. 59 (Campbell Coal Co. v. Manchester Baptist Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where A, assuming to act as the agent of a corporation, makes a contract for the corporation with a third person, which contract A has no legal authority from the corporation to execute, and where, however, the corporation receives a valuable benefit from the making of the contract, and retains and uses the property acquired by it under the contract, such acts of the corporation will ratify the unauthorized act of A in executing the contract for the corporation, and render the corporation liable on the contract. Merchants’ Bank of Macon v. Central Bank of Ga., 1 Ga. 418, 428 (44 Am. D. 665), and cit.; Ketchum v. Verdell, 42 Ga. 535; Haney School Furniture Co. v. Hightower Baptist Institute, 113 Ga. 289 (2), 296 (38 S. E. 761); Smith v. Goode & Nichols Furniture Co., 8 Ga. App. 84 (68 S. E. 620) ; Bacon v. Dannenberg Co., 24 Ga. App. 541 (5) (101 S. E. 699).
2. Under the foregoing ruling, the evidence for the plaintiff demanded a verdict in its favor, and the court erred in awarding a nonsuit.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 S.E. 59, 46 Ga. App. 729, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-coal-co-v-manchester-baptist-church-gactapp-1933.