Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Campanhac v. Lauramore

Campanhac v. Lauramore

264 So. 3d 412
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 8, 2019
DocketCase No. 5D18-1001; Case No. 5D18-1002
StatusPublished

This text of 264 So. 3d 412 (Campanhac v. Lauramore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campanhac v. Lauramore, 264 So. 3d 412 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

HARRIS, J.

Appellant, Noel Campanhac, appeals the trial court's final judgments of injunction for protection against stalking in these related cases,1 arguing that there was insufficient evidence of stalking to support the injunctions. After considering the limited testimony and evidence presented below and without the benefit of briefs or any appearance by Appellees, we agree with Appellant that there was no competent, substantial evidence to support a finding of stalking. See Packal v. Johnson, 226 So.3d 337, 338 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (holding that each incident of stalking must be proven by competent, substantial evidence to support injunction against stalking). Accordingly, we reverse the injunction.

REVERSED.

LAMBERT and SASSO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Packal v. Johnson
226 So. 3d 337 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 So. 3d 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campanhac-v-lauramore-fladistctapp-2019.