Campanelli v. AT&T Wireless Serv.

690 N.E.2d 1289, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1470, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 994
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 11, 1998
Docket98-94
StatusPublished

This text of 690 N.E.2d 1289 (Campanelli v. AT&T Wireless Serv.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campanelli v. AT&T Wireless Serv., 690 N.E.2d 1289, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1470, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 994 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

Stark App. Nos. 1997CA00109 and 1997CA00110. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue whether cellular telecommunication providers have public utility status for township zoning purposes. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 98-46, infra.

F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., dissent. Resnick, J., not participating.

The conflict case is Adam v. Bath Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals (July 23, 1997), Summit App. No. 18144, unreported, 1997 WL 423040.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
690 N.E.2d 1289, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1470, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campanelli-v-att-wireless-serv-ohio-1998.