Campanella v. Truxton Whirler & Derrick Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Campanella v. Truxton Whirler & Derrick Corp.

10 A.D.2d 712, 199 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11434

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 7, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 712 (Campanella v. Truxton Whirler & Derrick Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Campanella v. Truxton Whirler & Derrick Corp., 10 A.D.2d 712, 199 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11434 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and for conscious pain and suffering, the appeal is from an order which granted respondent’s motion to vacate the dismissal of the complaint and to restore the action to the calendar. The action was struck from the calendar on October 2, if)57 because of respondent’s failure to file a statement of readiness (Rules App. Div. [2d Dept.], special rule eff. Jan. 15, 1957, as amd.). On October 2, 1958 the complaint was dismissed because of respondent’s failure to cause the action to be restored to the calendar within one year (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 302). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and for conscious pain and suffering, the appeal is from an order which granted respondent’s motion to vacate the dismissal of the complaint and to restore the action to the calendar. The action was struck from the calendar on October 2, if)57 because of respondent’s failure to file a statement of readiness (Rules App. Div. [2d Dept.], special rule eff. Jan. 15, 1957, as amd.). On October 2, 1958 the complaint was dismissed because of respondent’s failure to cause the action to be restored to the calendar within one year (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 302). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 712, 199 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campanella-v-truxton-whirler-derrick-corp-nyappdiv-1960.