Campana v. Fadale

263 A.D. 1064, 34 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8064
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 25, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 263 A.D. 1064 (Campana v. Fadale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campana v. Fadale, 263 A.D. 1064, 34 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and facts and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the question of whether plaintiff’s injuries were received in the course of his employment was a question of fact [1065]*1065(Shountz v. Schwegler Brothers, Inc., 259 App. Div. 446.) All concur. (The judgment is for defendant in an automobile negligence action.) Present ■ — • Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Campana v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
267 A.D. 1007 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 A.D. 1064, 34 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campana-v-fadale-nyappdiv-1942.