Campana v. Fadale
This text of 263 A.D. 1064 (Campana v. Fadale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and facts and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the question of whether plaintiff’s injuries were received in the course of his employment was a question of fact [1065]*1065(Shountz v. Schwegler Brothers, Inc., 259 App. Div. 446.) All concur. (The judgment is for defendant in an automobile negligence action.) Present ■ — • Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 A.D. 1064, 34 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campana-v-fadale-nyappdiv-1942.