Campagnuolo v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Campagnuolo v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

334 So. 2d 172, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14614

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 30, 1976·No. No. AA-147·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause reaches us by petition for writ of certiorari to the respondent commission.

Exception is taken by petitioner to the order of revocation of parole for omission to make findings of fact. Upon the authority of King v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, Fla., 306 So.2d 506 (1975), this position appears justified. The cause is, therefore, remaanded to the respondent for entry of a proper order.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., McCORD, J., and WARREN, LAMAR, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause reaches us by petition for writ of certiorari to the respondent commission.

Exception is taken by petitioner to the order of revocation of parole for omission to make findings of fact. Upon the authority of King v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, Fla., 306 So.2d 506 (1975), this position appears justified. The cause is, therefore, remaanded to the respondent for entry of a proper order.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., McCORD, J., and WARREN, LAMAR, Associate Judge, concur.

Campagnuolo v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 334 So. 2d 172, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14614 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

334 So. 2d 172 (Campagnuolo v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related