Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Campagnuolo v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

Campagnuolo v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

334 So. 2d 172, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14614
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 30, 1976
DocketNo. AA-147
StatusPublished

This text of 334 So. 2d 172 (Campagnuolo v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campagnuolo v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 334 So. 2d 172, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14614 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause reaches us by petition for writ of certiorari to the respondent commission.

Exception is taken by petitioner to the order of revocation of parole for omission to make findings of fact. Upon the authority of King v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, Fla., 306 So.2d 506 (1975), this position appears justified. The cause is, therefore, remaanded to the respondent for entry of a proper order.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., McCORD, J., and WARREN, LAMAR, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission
306 So. 2d 506 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
334 So. 2d 172, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campagnuolo-v-florida-parole-probation-commission-fladistctapp-1976.