Campagna v. Dune Alpin Farm Associates

81 A.D.2d 633, 438 N.Y.S.2d 132, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11138
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 20, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 81 A.D.2d 633 (Campagna v. Dune Alpin Farm Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campagna v. Dune Alpin Farm Associates, 81 A.D.2d 633, 438 N.Y.S.2d 132, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11138 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 8, 1980, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 4) to dismiss the action on the ground that another action was already pending. Order modified, by adding thereto a provision consolidating this matter with the case of Dune Alpin Farm Assoc, v John [634]*634J. Campagna, Inc., now pending in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Special Term correctly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss this action inasmuch as a prior action was not yet pending at the time the instant action was commenced. This is because a summons served with notice but without a complaint does not cqnstitute “another action” within the meaning of CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 4) (Louis R. Shapiro, Inc. v Milspemes Corp., 20 AD2d 857; Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3211:19, p 26). However, to best serve the interests of judicial economy while still preserving the rights of the parties, the court should have sua sponte ordered consolidation of these actions. The court may make such an order on a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 4) even though neither party has requested such relief (see Seigel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR, 03211:19, p 25). Accordingly, we direct that these actions be consolidated. Damiani, J.P., Gibbons, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Soleil Chartered Bank v. Breton Equity Co. Corp.
2025 NY Slip Op 34407(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
Lohr v. Fenton
2025 NY Slip Op 31905(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
LaBuda v. LaBuda
2019 NY Slip Op 5366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Wharton v. Wharton
244 A.D.2d 404 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Kevorkian v. Harrington
158 Misc. 2d 464 (New York Supreme Court, 1993)
West Coast Co. v. Grafi
127 Misc. 2d 49 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1985)
Ultrashmere House, Ltd. v. 38 Town Associates
123 Misc. 2d 102 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 A.D.2d 633, 438 N.Y.S.2d 132, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campagna-v-dune-alpin-farm-associates-nyappdiv-1981.