Camp v. State
This text of 89 S.E. 450 (Camp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The court in charging the jury did not err in saying: “A doubt is not reasonable that, in the face of overwhelming or even strong evidence, assumes that the accused may possibly be innocent.” The expression, “in the face of overwhelming or even strong evidence,” was not argumentative and not harmful, when taken in connection with the entire charge, and could not have impressed the jury that the court considered the evidence of guilt as overwhelming. Clay v. State, [337]*3374 Ga. App. 142 (4), 147 (60 S. E. 1028); Campbell v. State, 144 Ga. 224 (2) (87 S. E. 277).
2. The evidence authorized the verdict; and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 S.E. 450, 18 Ga. App. 336, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camp-v-state-gactapp-1916.