Camp v. Reeves

150 N.E. 532, 241 N.Y. 508, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 691
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Camp v. Reeves. Read the opinion of the Court — 240 N.Y. 672
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 13, 1925·Published

Opinion

Motions for re-argument and to amend the remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs of only one motion. (See 240 N. Y. 672.) Held, that on the merits the legal liability of defendants rests solely on contract to disclose the facts of the defalcation of Herbert Reeves and the actions are barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Camp v. Reeves, 150 N.E. 532, 241 N.Y. 508, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 691 (N.Y. 1925).

150 N.E. 532 (Camp v. Reeves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Camp v. Reeves
148 N.E. 753 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)