Camp v. Pace
42 Ga. 161
Opinion
There was no error in the judgment of the Court below in overruling the demurrer to the complainant’s bill, or in refusing to dissolve the injunction until the final hearing of the cause, on the statement of facts contained in the record.
Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Camp v. Pace, 42 Ga. 161 (Ga. 1871).
42 Ga. 161 (Camp v. Pace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Quitman Cooperage Co. v. Peoples First National Bank
172 S.E. 17 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Crandall v. Shepard
143 S.E. 587 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Hecht v. Snook & Austin Furniture Co.
41 S.E. 74 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Bibb Land-Lumber Co. v. Lima Machine Works
30 S.E. 676 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Colson v. Kennedy
14 S.E. 119 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1891)