Camp v. National Equitable Society of Belton

108 Tex. 246
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 7, 1917
DocketApplication No. 9832; Motion No. 3860
StatusPublished

This text of 108 Tex. 246 (Camp v. National Equitable Society of Belton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camp v. National Equitable Society of Belton, 108 Tex. 246 (Tex. 1917).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice PHILLIPS

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit instituted in the Justice Court,'thereafter appealed to the County Court, to recover $110, the payment of which by the plaintiff, it was alleged, had been induced by fraudulent representations on the part of an agent of the defendant. The judgment of the County Court was reversed and judgment for appellant rendered by the Court of Civil Appeals. Application for writ of error was made to this court upon the ground that the decision was in conflict with that of another Court of Civil Appeals. It was dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

The case is one in which the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is by statute made final. Art. 1591, Rev. Stats.; Cole v. State, 106 Texas, 472, 170 S. W., 1036. In cases of which the jurisdiction of the Court of Civil Appeals is final, a conflict of decision does not confer jurisdiction upon this court to grant a writ of error. Gallagher v. Rahm, 88 Texas, 514, 32 S. W., 523. The motion is accordingly overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gallagher v. Rahm
32 S.W. 523 (Texas Supreme Court, 1895)
Cole v. State Ex Rel. Cobolini
170 S.W. 1036 (Texas Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 Tex. 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camp-v-national-equitable-society-of-belton-tex-1917.