Camp v. Murray Co.
This text of 284 F. 272 (Camp v. Murray Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a suit by the appellant, claiming as the owner of letters patent issued to him, seeking to charge the appellee with liability for making, using, and vending to others articles covered by the patent. The appellee set up the defense that what it did was in pursuance of a license or agreement granted or made by the appellant. We are of opinion that the evidence adduced called for the conclusion that by a valid agreement or understanding between the parties the appellee acquired the right to do what was complained of by the appellant.
It follows that the appellant is not entitled to a reversal of the decree appealed from. That decree is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
284 F. 272, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camp-v-murray-co-ca5-1922.