Camp v. Laurent

Supreme Court of Florida

Camp v. Laurent

46 Fla. 605

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 15, 1903·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon rehearing, a difference of opinion among the members of Division B, to which the case had been referred for disposition, necessitated its consideration by the whole court. A majority of the court are of the opinion that the finding of the referee is not supported by the evidence, and for this reason the judgment is reversed and a new trial ordered.

Taylor, C. J., and Shackleford, Hocker and Maxwell, JJ., concur. Carter and Cockrell, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon rehearing, a difference of opinion among the members of Division B, to which the case had been referred for disposition, necessitated its consideration by the whole court. A majority of the court are of the opinion that the finding of the referee is not supported by the evidence, and for this reason the judgment is reversed and a new trial ordered.

Taylor, C. J., and Shackleford, Hocker and Maxwell, JJ., concur. Carter and Cockrell, JJ., dissent.

Camp v. Laurent, 46 Fla. 605 (Fla. 1903).

Pincite

46 Fla. 605 (Camp v. Laurent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.