Camp v. King
This text of 17 S.E.2d 65 (Camp v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a suit in equity to set aside and cancel a series of deeds to described realty, beginning with a security deed executed by the plaintiff to the Trust Company of Georgia and duly transferred by the latter to E. M. Chapman Sr., by whom it was foreclosed. Parties to subsequent deeds were made defendants, but neither the Trust Company of Georgia no.r Chapman was so named. The judge overruled a demurrer raising this question of nonjoinder. This was error. Code, § 37-1004; Brown v. Wilcox, 147 Ga. 546 (94 S. E. 993); Zeigler v. Arnett, 142 Ga. 487 (83 S. E. 112); Jackson v. Harrison, 147 Ga. 631 (95 S. E. 215) ; Hermann v. Mobley, 172 Ga. 380 (158 S. E. 38); Fordham v. Duggan, 147 Ga. 610 (95 S. E. 3); Taylor v. Colley, 138 Ga. 41 (74 S. E. 694); Reeves v. Tarnok, 161 Ga. 838 (131 S. E. 891); A., B. & A. Ry. Co. v. Smith, 148 Ga. 282 (96 S. E. 562); Warren County Fertilizer Co. v. Reese, 156 Ga. 824 (120 S. E. 534).
The judge having erred in overruling this demurrer, and the defect pointed out by the demurrer not having been cured, the action should have been dismissed. Swann v. Wright, 176 Ga. 372, 375 (168 S. E. 11).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 S.E.2d 65, 193 Ga. 3, 1941 Ga. LEXIS 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camp-v-king-ga-1941.