Camp v. Janes

6 Ohio 417
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1834
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Ohio 417 (Camp v. Janes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camp v. Janes, 6 Ohio 417 (Ohio 1834).

Opinion

By the Court :

There is no pretense of a joint contract as far as Hulet is concerned. His undertaking is original, distinct, and separate, having no reference to a connection with the undertaking of James. A joint action can not be sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Ohio 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camp-v-janes-ohio-1834.