Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Camp v. Janes

Camp v. Janes

6 Ohio 417
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1834·Published

Opinion

By the Court :

There is no pretense of a joint contract as far as Hulet is concerned. His undertaking is original, distinct, and separate, having no reference to a connection with the undertaking of James. A joint action can not be sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Camp v. Janes, 6 Ohio 417 (Ohio 1834).

6 Ohio 417 (Camp v. Janes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.