Camp v. Hilliard

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Camp v. Hilliard

58 N.H. 42

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1876·Published

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

The review, whether prosecuted by writ or order, was so far a new action that the judgment in it was not secured by the attachment made in the original suit. Bell v. Bartlett, 7 N. H. 178; Badger v. Gilmore, 37 N. H. 457, 463; Sanford v. Candia, 54 N. H. 419.

Judgment on the verdict.

Stanley, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe, C. J.

The review, whether prosecuted by writ or order, was so far a new action that the judgment in it was not secured by the attachment made in the original suit. Bell v. Bartlett, 7 N. H. 178; Badger v. Gilmore, 37 N. H. 457, 463; Sanford v. Candia, 54 N. H. 419.

Judgment on the verdict.

Stanley, J., did not sit.

Camp v. Hilliard, 58 N.H. 42 (N.H. 1876).

Pincite

58 N.H. 42 (Camp v. Hilliard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.