Camp v. Hamrick

228 S.E.2d 289, 139 Ga. App. 456, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1842
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 15, 1976·No. 52373·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

In this garnishment proceeding, the garnishee answered that it was not indebted to the defendant. The plaintiff did not traverse the answer. The failure to file a timely traverse entitled the garnishee to be discharged. Knight v. Herring & McGehee, 161 Ga. 58 (129 SE 526).

Judgment affirmed. Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Camp v. Hamrick, 228 S.E.2d 289, 139 Ga. App. 456, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1842 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

228 S.E.2d 289 (Camp v. Hamrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Akins v. Magbee Bros. Lumber & Supply Co.
264 S.E.2d 334 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)