Camp v. Hamlin & Barnum

55 Ga. 259
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 15, 1875·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Bleckley, Judge.

Fruit trees were sold by written contract, at a stipulated price, to be delivered at a certain place on a certain day., the price to be paid on delivery. They were tendered to the purchaser at the time and place, according to contract, and he declined to receive them. Thereupon the seller lingered forty days, and during that period sold them at auction. The tes[262]*262timony shows that they were worth at the time of tender the price fixed by Ihe contract, but the proceeds at auction amounted to only about one-third of that price. The mere fact is stated, in the evidence, that they were sold at auction and brought so much. The plaintiff should enter into a more full and minute accounting as to the auction, in order to use it as a final test of value. The views of the court are expressed in the head-notes.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Camp v. Hamlin & Barnum, 55 Ga. 259 (Ga. 1875).

55 Ga. 259 (Camp v. Hamlin & Barnum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White & Hamilton Lumber Co. v. Lynch
125 S.E. 472 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Dudley A. Tyng & Co. v. Woodward
88 A. 243 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1913)
George v. Lane
102 P. 55 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1908)
North Georgia Milling Co. v. Henderson Elevator Co.
60 S.E. 258 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. Columbia Improvement Co.
60 S.E. 279 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Regester v. Regester
64 A. 286 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1906)
Redhead Bros. v. Wyoming Cattle Investment Co.
102 N.W. 144 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1905)
Magnes v. Sioux City Nursery & Seed Co.
14 Colo. App. 219 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1900)
Morris v. Cohn
17 S.W. 342 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1891)