Camp v. Bagwell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Camp v. Bagwell

99 S.E. 234, 23 Ga. App. 690, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 293

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 7, 1919

Docket10141

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 S.E. 234 (Camp v. Bagwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Camp v. Bagwell, 99 S.E. 234, 23 Ga. App. 690, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 293 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. The charge of the court covered "substantially the , controlling issues in the case, and, in the absence of any timely, appropriate, written request for fuller instruction, the omission to charge upon all the contentions of the defendant was not error.

2. The alleged newly discovered evidence was cumulative and impeaching in its character, and the court did not err in overruling the special ground of the motion for a new trial based thereon.

3. There was a sharp conflict in the evidence, but the jury decided the issue in favor of the plaintiffs, anil, there being some evidence to support the verdict, which has been approved by the trial judge, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is

Affirmed.

Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI