Camp Transfer & Storage Co. Inc. v. Kampf

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Camp Transfer & Storage Co. Inc. v. Kampf

118 S.E. 500, 30 Ga. App. 622, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 573

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 11, 1923

Docket14202

StatusPublished

This text of 118 S.E. 500 (Camp Transfer & Storage Co. Inc. v. Kampf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Camp Transfer & Storage Co. Inc. v. Kampf, 118 S.E. 500, 30 Ga. App. 622, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 573 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. The charge in this case was clear and fair, and fully covered the issues raised, and a new trial is not required because of the alleged error in the excerpt from the charge, to the effect that the jury were not bound by the opinion of certain witnesses.

2. Questions of diligence and negligence are peculiarly for the jury; and the jury in this case, on conflicting evidence, having determined the issues in favor of the plaintiff, and as this court cannot say that there is no evidence to support the verdict, we will not interfere with it.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur. Anderson & Slate, for plaintiff in error. F. G. Tindall, Brandon & Bynds, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

1. The charge in this case was clear and fair, and fully covered the issues raised, and a new trial is not required because of the alleged error in the excerpt from the charge, to the effect that the jury were not bound by the opinion of certain witnesses.

2. Questions of diligence and negligence are peculiarly for the jury; and the jury in this case, on conflicting evidence, having determined the issues in favor of the plaintiff, and as this court cannot say that there is no evidence to support the verdict, we will not interfere with it.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur. Anderson & Slate, for plaintiff in error. F. G. Tindall, Brandon & Bynds, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 S.E. 500, 30 Ga. App. 622, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camp-transfer-storage-co-inc-v-kampf-gactapp-1923.