Camp Phosphate Co. v. Marion County

194 So. 2d 302, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5249
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 31, 1967
DocketNo. I-177
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 194 So. 2d 302 (Camp Phosphate Co. v. Marion County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camp Phosphate Co. v. Marion County, 194 So. 2d 302, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5249 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

Camp Phosphate Company by this interlocutory appeal seeks review of an order of taking entered in an eminent domain proceeding. Appellee Marion County has moved to dismiss upon the following grounds, viz.: 1. That said order is not final, and does not relate to venue or jurisdiction over the person of defendant-appel-lee, and 2. That this interlocutory appeal is frivolous. The third ground alleged relates to the merits of the cause which we need not explore here.

In Wilson v. Jacksonville Expressway, 110 So.2d 707 (1959), this court held that an order of talcing entered in an eminent domain proceeding pursuant to statutory authority is an action at law, and an interlocutory appeal therefrom is not available other than from questions concerning venue or jurisdiction over the person. We adhere to that decision in every respect. However, here, Appellant in its brief and by oral argument has urged this court to treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certio-rari in the event we hold that same was improvidently taken. We so hold.

Since we find that a justiciable issue meriting immediate review has been shown, we exercise our discretion by treating the instant interlocutory appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Section 59.45, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., and Couse v. Canal Authority, January 31, 1967, 194 So.2d 301.

From an examination of the record we conclude that the second and third grounds of defendant’s motion are without merit.

The motion to dismiss is denied.

RAWLS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Belle Glade v. Florida East Coast Railway
344 So. 2d 873 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Cordova v. City of Tucson
489 P.2d 727 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1971)
Seadade Industries, Inc. v. Florida Power & Light Co.
232 So. 2d 46 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Trien v. Dade County ex rel. Board of County Commissioners
222 So. 2d 456 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Adams v. Dade County
202 So. 2d 585 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 So. 2d 302, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camp-phosphate-co-v-marion-county-fladistctapp-1967.